Historical Preservation in Rust-Belt China: The Life and Death of Jihong Bridge in Harbin


rust-belt cities
historical preservation
public participation




This article examines how China’s rust-belt cities deploy historical preservation for urban revitalization. Drawing upon fieldwork interviews and online debates, it investigates the preservation battle over Jihong Bridge in Harbin in northeast China. Built by Russian settlers in the early 20th century, Jihong Bridge symbolizes the birth of Harbin as a railway city, but a century later, it stood in the way of the local government’s ambitious plan for building high-speed rail. The municipal government elevated the bridge, significantly modifying its structure to allow high-speed trains to pass underneath. The renovation was heavily criticized by local preservationists, who invoked the government’s own preservation regulations to try to save the bridge. The study highlights the dilemma faced by local governments of rust-belt cities, as they are caught between the desire to deploy historical architecture for city branding and competing priorities of infrastructure investment.


Lee CK. Against the law: Labor protest in China’s rustbelt and sunbelt. 2007, University of California Press, Berkeley.

Wang M, Zhang P, Ma Y. Old industrial cities seeking new roads of industrialization. 2014, World Scientific Press, Singapore.

State Council. Cultural Heritage Protection Law. 2017, State Council, Beijing.

Ludwig C, Walton L, Wang Y. The heritage turn in China: The reinvention, dissemination and consumption of heritage. 2020. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

Wang J. City Record. 2006, Sanlian, Beijing.

Ren X. Building globalization: Transnational architecture production in urban China. 2011, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Zhang D. Courtyard housing and cultural sustainability: Theory, practice, and product. 2013, Ashgate, Oxfordshire.

Zhang Y. Steering toward growth: Symbolic urban preservation in Beijing, 1990-2005 [J]. Town Planning Review, 2008, 79(203): 187-208.

Zhang Y. The fragmented politics of urban preservation: Beijing, Chicago, Paris. 2013, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

Shin, HB. Urban conservation and revalorization of dilapidated historic quarters: The case of Nanluoguxiang in Beijing [J]. Cities, 2010, 27: 43-54.

Wang YW, Wang X. Industrial heritage valorisation and creative industry proliferation in Shanghai’s urban regeneration [J]. Built Heritage, 2018, 2(2): 76-92.

He S, Wu F. Property-led redevelopment in post-reform China: A case study of Xintiandi redevelopment project in Shanghai [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2005, 27(1): 1-23.

Ren X. Forward to the past: Historical preservation in globalizing Shanghai [J]. City & Community, 2008, 7(1): 23-43.

Ren X. The political economy of urban ruins: Redeveloping Shanghai [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2014, 38(2): 1081-91.

Zhang S. The preservation of 20th-century architectural heritage in China: Evolution and prospects [J]. Built Heritage, 2018, 2(2): 4-16.

Chen H, Wang L, Waley P. The right to envision the city? The emerging vision conflicts in redeveloping historic Nanjing [J]. Urban Affairs Review, 2020, 56(6): 1746-1778.

Zhao Y, Ponzini D, Zhang R. The policy networks of heritage-led development in Chinese historic cities: The case of Xi’an Big Wild Goose Pagoda area [J]. Habitat International, 2020, 96: 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102106

Zhu Y. Heritage and romantic consumption in China. 2018, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

Svensson M. Evolving and contested cultural heritage in China: The rural heritagescape. In Reconsidering cultural heritage in East Asia. 2016, Ubiquity Press, London, 31-46.

Zhu Y, Maags C. Heritage politics in China: The power of the past. 2020. Routledge, London and New York.

Fiskesjo M. Politics of cultural heritage. In Reclaiming Chinese society: The new social activism. 2010, Routledge, New York, 225-245.

Law A, Qin Q. Searching for economic and cosmopolitan roots: Historical imaginaries and Hankou merchant port nostalgia [J]. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 2018, 35(2): 173-195.

Chang Q. A Chinese approach to urban heritage conservation and inheritance: Focus on the contemporary changes of Shanghai’s historic spaces [J]. Built Heritage, 2017, 1(1): 13-33.

Lu Y, Li Y. Defining local heritage in preserving modern Shanghai architecture [J]. Built Heritage, 2019, 3(2): 3-20.

LaCouture E. Dwelling in the world: Family, house, and home in Tianjin, China, 1860-1960. 2021, Columbia University Press, New York.

Carter J. Creating a Chinese Harbin: Nationalism in an international city. 2002, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Duara P. Sovereignty and authenticity: Manchukoku and the East Asia modern. 2003, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.

Qu W, Li S. The Jews in Harbin. 2006, Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing.

Zhang K. Chinese city with a Russian past struggling to preserve its legacy. New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/04/w

orld/asia/harbin-china-russia-architecture.html, June 4, 2017.

Cho MY. The specter of “the people”: Urban poverty in northeast China. 2013, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Ren X. Harbin: Revitalizing a rust-belt city through culture. The Online Journal of the China Policy Institute, 2016, viewed May 30, 2020,


Harbin Urban Planning Bureau. Glance back the Old City’s Charm of Harbin. 2006, Chinese Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.

Rithmire M. Land bargains and Chinese capitalism: The politics of property rights under reform. 2015, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Harbin City Government. Harbin Urban Masterplan 2011-2020. 2011, Harbin City Government, Harbin.

Harbin City Government. Harbin Urban Masterplan 2016-2030. 2016, Harbin City Government, Harbin.

Wu F. Planning for growth: Urban and regional planning in China. 2015, Routledge, London.

Koga Y. The atmosphere of a foreign country: Harbin’s architectural inheritance. In Consuming the entrepreneurial city: Image, memory, spectacle. 2008, Routledge, New York, 221-254.

Zhang Q. Demolition and reconstruction of St. Nicholas Church in Harbin [T]. 2017, Department of Sociology, Harbin Institute of Technology.

Harbin City Government. Harbin historical and cultural city preservation regulation. 2011, Harbin City Government, Harbin.

Wang Y. Collision and integration: An interpretation of modern architecture in Daowai, Harbin. 2018, Harbin Institute of Technology Press, Harbin.

Yin H, Wang X. Cultural trauma of the redevelopment of historical urban neighborhoods [J]. Contemporary Urban Research, 2014, 6: 22-30.

Descamps J. Authenticity, tourism, and residents: The dilemma of heritage conservation in China. Modu Magazine, https://www.modumag.com/articles/authenticity-tourism-and-residents-the-dilemma-of-heritage-conservation-in-china/, April 30, 2019.

Chang H. Jihong Bridge: Too early to say farewell? Harbin Stories, https://www.imharbin.com/post/18221, December 22, 2015.

Zeng Y. Protect Harbin’s landmark – Jihong Bridge. Heilongjiang Daily, https://www.imharbin.com/post/7591, February 4, 2009.

Zeng Y. Jihong Bridge must be protected according to the law. https://www.imharbin.com/post/14436, April 5, 2014.

Gao H. “Looking for mysteries: Stories behind the old buildings in Harbin—Jihong Bridge” in Harbin Stories. https://www.imharbin.com/post/22469, July 29, 2016.

Luo J, Liu C. Plans for preserving Jihong Bridge causing controversies. https://news.qq.com/a/20170211/007670.htm, February 11, 2017.

HIT (Harbin Institute of Technology). Petition letter regarding on-site preservation of Jihong Bridge from the Faculty of Architecture at Harbin Institute of Technology. Harbin Stories, https://www.imharbin.com/post/20288, June 1, 2016.

Dong L. Still remember the last look of Jihong Bridge? Harbin Stories, https://www.imharbin.com/post/44549, November 8, 2018.

Tianlai. Farewell: National cultural heritage protection unit, Jihong Bridge. https://3g.163.com/dy/article/DNSHQR0E0522LGET.html, July 29, 2018.

Interview by the author, January 20, 2020.

O’Brien K, Li L. Rightful resistance in rural China. 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.